Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Deployment Forum HomeDeployment Forum ArticlesDeployment Forum Download LibraryDeployment Forum Member BlogsDeployment Forum Community Forums
Member Login
StandardLiveID


Register
Forgot Password ?



Guests can view and read messages in the community forums, but you must register and log in to Deployment Forum before you can post messages. Click Register at the top of this page. Before posting messages, please read the forum guidelines at the bottom of this page.

Subject: Strange USMT behaviour
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

AuthorMessages
ArthurHUser is Offline

Posts:5

Send Message
12/19/2007 4:19 AM  

I am experiencing some strange USMT301 behaviour.

First this: because we didn't want our users to lose their cookies after migrating to a new system we decided we had to create something for it. I created a migcookies.xml file to include those as well.

The xml is good and can be read (as it says in the logfiles), so that is not the problem.

The scanstate process is good, no errors in there. But when I run loadstate it doesn't migrate the cookies (and some other settings like wallpaper). If I run the same command line (right out of the loadstate.log file) again, the cookies are imported. After it is run for the first time, I can see the actual cookie files are migrated and in place, they are just not recognized bij Windows. After the second time, the cookies are actually used. This is something we of course do not want. We want it be okay after running loadstate.exe just once.

Has anybody experienced the same thing?

I have attached the two loadstate logfiles. Loadstate 1 is of course after it ran the first time. Loadstate 2 is after it ran the second time and everything was migrated succesfully. I removed some lines from the logfiles. They seem to be irrelevant to the USMT process and made the files larger than 60kb which is the max size for uploading attachments.


Attachment: loadstate_1.zip
Attachment: loadstate_2.zip

Or TsemahUser is Offline

Posts:52

Send Message
12/19/2007 5:13 AM  
Vista or XP ?
ArthurHUser is Offline

Posts:5

Send Message
12/19/2007 5:59 AM  
It is XP to XP
You are not authorized to post a reply.



ActiveForums 3.7
Forum Policies
Minimize

These forums are a user-supported community for IT professionals to exchange deployment tips, solutions, and techniques. For the benefit of all Deployment Forum members, please observe the following guidelines when posting to these forums:

  • We reserve the right to remove any message. Our moderators will remove all messages that are not respectful or productive. Profanity, racism, prejudice, and flaming are not tolerated.
  • Do not advertise products or services. Our moderators will remove all advertisements or service announcements. Product and service recommendations from active Deployment Forum members are encouraged, however.
  • Make sure your question isn't already answered. Before posting questions, search the forums. After ensuring that your questions are unique, post them to the most appropriate forum. This will help reduce noise in the forums.
  • Help make the most of each thread. Do not post unrelated messages to a thread. Also, if you've resolved a question outside of these forums, please share the solution with other members by posting it back to the thread.
  • Do not share confidential information. Confidential information includes product keys and addresses. Our moderators will edit any message containing confidential information, so double-check messages and their attachments before posting them.
  • Post messages using only the English language. For the benefit of all Deployment Forum members, please post your messages using the English language.

We hope that you enjoy using this community. Please submit your comments and feedback on the Comments and Feedback page or post them to the Comments, Feedback forum.



Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
© 2007 Jerry Honeycutt